Archive for the ‘Facebook’ Category

Spotify and Facebook: No more guilty pleasures

Monday, September 26th, 2011

The full implications of Spotify and Facebook’s love-in became quite apparent today. The first point of controversy: you now need a Facebook account to create a new Spotify account. I’ve already got a Spotify account and a Facebook account so this didn’t really bother me, even though I think it’s a strange and exclusive move (as in, excluding non-Facebook users).

But when I got home this evening and logged into Spotify, it dawned on me that Spotify and Facebook really, really want me to combine my accounts:

Spotify Loves Social

(more…)

Facebook design changes: user experience and the user environment

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

So, Facebook rolled out some new design changes today. From the moment I heard about it, I think everyone knew that it’d be big yet ultimately dull news.

As one friend put in a succinct Facebook update:

That time of the year has come again – Facebook layout changes

Side effects will include a barrage of posts from people who claim it has caused them distress, anxiety, agitation, blurred vision, hair loss, insomnia, diarrhoea and erectile dysfunction.

Users hate change. Redesigns at best are met with softly spoken praise; at worst with fury and backlash.

As a designer I always try to stifle my inner-user when dealing with a new design. I try to understand and appreciate the thought behind it, knowing only too well how much time, thought and discussion has been put into every minute detail.

But what also really fascinates me is after using a new design of a site, seeing what others think of it, and trying to reconcile their thoughts with not only my own opinion of the design, but what I think was the strategy behind the design itself.
(more…)

A single serving site story

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Several years ago Jason Kottke coined the phrase ‘single serving site‘ to describe websites that have a single purpose: often to provide a simple answer to a question. The web has had a long history of these sites, ranging from whether Kayne West is still a douche bag or not (apparently he still is) through to whether former News of the World editor Rebekah Brooks has been arrested yet (yes, thankfully).

In fact the controversy over Rebekah Brooks and NOTW spawned many of these sites: starting with hasrebekahbrooksbeensackedyet.com and now hasjamesmurdochbeenarrestedyet.com. This year it seems the single serving site has become quite a feature within British online culture — starting off with football-themed sites such as hasfernandotorresscoredforchelsea.com back in January and then sincearsenallastwonatrophy.co.uk which popped up in May.

In late June, Chelsea FC appointed André Villas-Boas as their new manager. Chelsea managers are often the victims of fickle owner Roman Abromovich’s thirst for success; since he took over the club in 2003, there have been eight managers in total (including Villas-Boas). A few days after the announcement I wondered if anyone had setup a site about whether he was still manager or not. It appeared not, so I thought I’d grab the domain and contribute to the meme, and also try to put a nice visual layer on top for some fun.

Has André Villas-Boas Been Sacked Yet

(more…)

Google +/- ?

Sunday, July 3rd, 2011

Three days in to using Google+ and it’s clear the platform is really well executed and highly polished.

However, the few threads going on in my stream are all related to Google+ itself — almost like a meta social network. As one friend remarked:

‘Right, since it seems Google+ is the place to talk only about Google+, i’ll continue the trend: Create a Circle, and then delete it…. enjoy the animation :-)’

Since it’s currently invite only, it’s understandable that activity on the network is fairly light. But what’s a social network without the social side? I wonder if Google are restricting sign ups just to ensure the service doesn’t collapse under the influx of users?

(more…)

User experience and the touchy subject of personal taste

Sunday, June 26th, 2011

I signed up to Songkick yesterday: a great idea for a site that lets you track when your favourite artists are performing nearby. I chose to login using Facebook Connect and got this list of suggested artists:

Songkick

Coldplay as the first recommendation? I can’t stand Coldplay!

I found myself quite indignant at being recommended I like Coldplay. But it’s not really about Coldplay, it’s about being suggested I engage with something I really don’t like. (So if you like Coldplay, please just think of your least favourite band in this scenario!)

(more…)

The slow decline of Flickr

Sunday, June 19th, 2011

I used to be a Flickr addict. I would shoot as much as I could and upload at least a few days a week. But the past few months, I’ve found myself spending less and less time on the site. Why?

Flickr Stats
Part of it is definitely the improvement in Facebook’s handling of photos. Facebook now provides higher quality images and the ability to share my photos with a much larger selection of friends.

And that’s where I think Flickr is starting to fall behind: there is a distinct lack of updates and new ‘features’ on the site. Twitter and Facebook are always tweaking their interface (with varying degrees of success and often with a fair bit of controversy). But the last major interface update I can remember was to sharing photos in March 2011. And that was hardly a massive new feature.

(more…)

Facebook, privacy and the mystery of l.php

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

Referrals on your site from Facebook? Good luck getting any sort of idea who sent you there. Unless it’s from a public page, all you’re bound to see is one simple referring URL: http://www.facebook.com/l.php. Facebook ‘wraps’ all links on Facebook within this simple file — once you click on a link in Facebook, l.php will ‘redirect’ you to the actual URL. Why Facebook does this is unclear. Possibly to protect user’s anonymity when accessing links — or is it something more strategic?

Given Facebook’s perennial privacy issues, seemingly providing its users such anonymity when accessing links seems out of character. Twitter links can be tricky to track, but since most accounts are public it’s fairly easy to track what users have linked to you by using services such as the bit.ly info page or topsy.com (but not Twitter’s search, because it’s utterly rubbish).

Are Facebook genuinely protecting users from being seen in referrals, or are they just harvesting all this data for themselves? Are they planning to keep it secret and build up better ‘user profiles’ (probably, which is quite scary) or will they launch some sort of premium API service where websites can see what Facebook users are accessing their site? (even scarier, although the privacy implications of this are massive).

But perhaps Facebook do have a strange sense of privacy for their users. There’s no way to know how many people have viewed your profile on Facebook (although countless malware applications claim to do so, and such a feature is no doubt a reason they propagate so successfully). This is probably for the best, as if they enabled something like that there’s a good chance many relationships would get quite awkward. Suddently realising some person you met at a party three years ago constantly looks at your profile would no doubt be very unnerving — nevermind if it was someone such as a close friend’s partner.

Scarily, only a few weeks back I discovered LinkedIn does exactly this: you can opt-in to see who can see your profile, and people you view can also see that you’ve looked. I find this quite creepy — would Facebook ever do this? I doubt, and really hope that they don’t.